Engineering and municipal operations
Establish the hazard and the notice failure: what condition triggers a repair duty, how long a defect of this character takes to develop, and whether the city's own systems should have caught it.
A pothole case that develops into a Complex Regional Pain Syndrome diagnosis requires an expert team spanning several disciplines, each addressing a different piece of the liability and damages puzzle. Assembling the right experts California pothole CRPS trial team, and sequencing their testimony correctly, is often the difference between a jury that awards damages reflecting the injury's true severity and one that undervalues a condition it does not fully understand.
A civil or pavement-condition engineer evaluates the specific defect, applicable municipal and industry pavement standards, and any curb or drainage design factors, translating a photograph into an objective standard-of-care analysis. A separate municipal operations or public works expert evaluates whether the city's actual inspection and repair practices, as reflected in its records, met industry standards, turning internal record gaps into an affirmative standard-of-care violation rather than leaving the jury to infer it.
A physician board-certified in pain medicine or physiatry walks the jury through the Budapest Criteria using the plaintiff's own findings, and preemptively explains why disproportionate pain is a defining feature of CRPS rather than exaggeration. A certified life care planner, working with treating physicians, itemizes lifetime future needs, and an economist converts that plan into a present-value figure accounting for life expectancy, discount rates, and medical inflation.
Establish the hazard and the notice failure: what condition triggers a repair duty, how long a defect of this character takes to develop, and whether the city's own systems should have caught it.
Establish the diagnosis through recognized criteria and quantify a lifetime of care as an itemized plan rather than a lump sum.
Present liability experts first, then the pain-medicine diagnosis, then the life-care planner and economist. Presenting damages before liability is established risks the jury discounting the damages testimony.
The case behind this page
A comprehensive expert team produced a verdict including $7M future medical and $9M future noneconomic damages.
Read the verdict storyRelated damages
How to make an invisible, incurable chronic-pain diagnosis concrete.
The CRPS damages guideRelated breakdowns from this case and our CRPS practice.
We take catastrophic CRPS and chronic-pain cases as counsel or co-counsel and pay statutory referral fees.
Refer a caseTypically a civil or pavement engineering expert, a municipal operations or public works expert, a pain medicine or physiatry expert, a certified life care planner, and an economist, each addressing a distinct piece of the liability and damages case.
The civil engineering expert focuses on the physical defect and applicable pavement maintenance standards, while the municipal operations expert focuses on whether the city's actual inspection and repair practices, as shown in its records, met industry-standard practices.
Presenting liability experts before damages experts allows the jury to first accept that the defendant is responsible before evaluating specific damages figures, which tends to produce more favorable consideration of the damages testimony that follows.